Hunting, looting, crafting, and cooking giant beasts in a vast world – all of that certainly sounds like a new game. Monster Hunter-game and basically it is wild hearts, the new IP from EA Originals, exactly that. Why the game from developer Omega Force is still far from being a top-tier title. "cheap imitation" To find out in our review how EA's brand new IP could take root and to what extent it is.
A few things to start with
Some of my negative points are related to wild hearts Unfortunately, this becomes apparent right at the beginning. The fact that you can't adjust the difficulty at any point probably won't be a problem for many, but it will be for some, and this could quickly put off many potential long-term gamers. So, as we begin the rather confusing opening moments of the game, it quickly becomes clear that the camera is very sluggish and there's very little you can do about it.
As is typical for such games, there's a character editor, and in this case, it's quite something. The implementation is generally the same in every game, but the scope varies, and consequently, the game's features can be quite extensive. wild hearts The fact that you can really let loose here in an extremely wide range of ways.
Less would have been more once again.
I am aware that I am particularly sensitive to an overwhelming number of options, and this is probably not even that different from the others. Monster HunterDespite playing the game, I simply have to mention the sheer endless amount of loot. While the huge variety of weapons is fun, when you look at everything you can find, craft, assemble, and otherwise use, it personally kills my motivation, as I get the feeling I won't be able to experience even a fraction of the game.
The crafting system is simplified, and the gadgets are a lot of fun, which is certainly commendable. The huge map never feels overwhelming and, apart from a few minor glitches, looks quite good. It really scores big points. wild hearts but in the combat system and the monsters themselves.
On par with Monster Hunter?
That the first monsters leave a lasting impression on the player is something very few would deny. The creativity here was given such free rein that the fun doesn't just come from the sheer challenge and variety; at some point, I simply reached the point where I absolutely had to see what the next big monster would look like.
Combined with these monsters, the well-designed combat system was a genuine surprise. While everything works like the original, it still takes some getting used to. The aforementioned gadgets, which were subsequently added, are a welcome addition and give the game a unique dynamic.
Clone or competitor?
Clone. Yes, that will probably be the direct answer to this question, because competition could wild hearts only then for the Monster Hunter-series, if there were anything here that the original couldn't do. wild hearts With minor changes, it's essentially exactly what Capcom's successful series is, only with a far worse story and a much sloppier technical implementation.
The monsters are truly impressive, that much is undeniable, and overall this is a coherent and fun game. I probably wouldn't play a well-made clone for very long, even with a co-op mode like the one in this game, and so... wild hearts Most likely to disappear into obscurity in the not-too-distant future. Nevertheless, the game is worth a look and might appeal to some. Monster HunterThis will certainly shorten the wait for a new installment for fans.
Conclusion Wild Hearts
The conclusion, with its pros and cons list, doesn't give me a coherent picture. For example, the technical aspects aren't listed on the cons list, and a "6" rating for them seems too low to me (purely theoretically based on the points listed).
Otherwise, I've been following the title for a while, but I'm not satisfied with the technology, which is why I'm currently refraining from buying it – especially at full price.